Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now

  Greenhouse gas dynamics in upland agricultural systems


   Faculty of Life and Health Sciences

This project is no longer listed on FindAPhD.com and may not be available.

Click here to search FindAPhD.com for PhD studentship opportunities
  Prof P Jordan, Dr J Arnscheidt, Ms S Cook  No more applications being accepted  Competition Funded PhD Project (Students Worldwide)

About the Project

Upland agricultural systems for sheep and beef enterprises cover approximately 141,000ha, or 14%, of agricultural land in Northern Ireland. While soil primary productivity and food production (£/ha) is higher for more intensive lowland farming, the other four soil functions (nutrient cycling, carbon sequestration, water regulation and biodiversity) are more prominent in upland systems. However, upland farming on peatlands has provided modern challenges based on historical land management. Even with large stores, carbon sequestration and water regulation in the uplands can be impacted, for example, by (historical) land drainage on peatlands (Grand-Clement et al., 2013). Furthermore, extreme events can induce feedbacks between wetting and drying cycles and alter the carbon balance (Dhillon and Inamdar, 2013).

Previous upland research indicates that restoration of drained areas can offset some carbon losses, although there is some ambiguity on the scale of effectiveness (Wilson et al., 2011; Turner et al., 2013). Carbon flux in the uplands should be placed into context with expected emissions factors used in land use accounting, and with other agricultural sectors in Northern Ireland. For example, IPCC Tier 2 emission factors used in Northern Ireland agriculture are not generally based on domestic studies, and can be bluntly applied to heterogenous land management units (Peter et al., 2016). At the scale of the hill farm, information is required to test expected gaseous emissions over different sub-environments (deep peat, shallow peat, wet grassland, etc.), and during different conditions such as drought periods.

Even with high-temporal resoluation gas monitoring (CO2/CH4), there are important knowledge gaps on the magnitude and seasonality of gas emissions spatially (e.g., different ecotopes and areas in different phases of degradation/restoration), and which can aid in validating more remotely sensed data (e.g., Lees et al., 2021). Such knowledge is important to upland agriculture as policy seeks to maximise soil functions as public goods, and which can be developed into results-based ecosystems’ services payment schemes.

This proposal will investigate gaseous emission knowledge gaps in the context of a 1,000ha hill farm research platform in Northern Ireland (in collaboration with the College of Agriculture, Food and Rural Enterprise), where greenhouse gas emissions are monitored continuously at a flux tower site.

The aim of the proposal is to assess upland gas dynamics to aid in the development of results-based ecosystems services schemes. The experimental objectives are to:

Assess the use of a mobile gas analyser for spatial investigations of CO2 and CH4 emissions in upland areas.

Compare spatial gas emissions over peatland and other ecotopes compared with static higher resolution measurements.

Compare gas emissions from peatlands under different stages of restoration.

Agriculture (1) Environmental Sciences (13) Geography (17)

References

Grand-Clement, E., Anderson, K., Smith, D., Luscombe, D., Gatis, N., Ross, M. and Brazier, R., 2013. Evaluating ecosystem goods and services after restoration of marginal upland peatlands in South-West England. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(2), pp.324-334.
Lees, K.J., Khomik, M., Quaife, T., Clark, J.M., Hill, T., Klein, D., Ritson, J. and Artz, R.R.E., 2021. Assessing the reliability of peatland GPP measurements by remote sensing: From plot to landscape scale. Science of The Total Environment, 766, 142613.
Peter, C., Fiore, A., Hagemann, U., Nendel, C. and Xiloyannis, C., 2016. Improving the accounting of field emissions in the carbon footprint of agricultural products: a comparison of default IPCC methods with readily available medium-effort modeling approaches. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(6), pp.791-805.
Turner, E., Worrall, F. and Burt, T., 2013. The effect of drain blocking on the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) budget of an upland peat catchment in the UK. Journal of Hydrology, 479, pp.169-179.
Wilson, L., Wilson, J., Holden, J., Johnstone, I., Armstrong, A. and Morris, M., 2011. Ditch blocking, water chemistry and organic carbon flux: Evidence that blanket bog restoration reduces erosion and fluvial carbon loss. Science of The Total Environment, 409(11), pp.2010-2018.

How good is research at Ulster University - Coleraine Campus in Geography and Environmental Studies?


Research output data provided by the Research Excellence Framework (REF)

Click here to see the results for all UK universities
Search Suggestions
Search suggestions

Based on your current searches we recommend the following search filters.

 About the Project