Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now

  History of Classical Film Theory


   School of Arts and Creative Industries

  ,  Applications accepted all year round  Self-Funded PhD Students Only

About the Project

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This project, one of two companion studies, explores the epistemologies and debates that constitute classical film theory (arguably 1900 – 1970s, although part of this study is to help to clarify the periodisation of classical film theory). Classical film theory is largely concerned with film form and representation, and underscored by related philosophies, social theories, and psychological theories. It developed not just from the emergence of film, but also philosophy and psychological theories of perception. Initially film was conceived as a copying machine, but soon filmmakers began to explore the artistic capacities of the medium, not only by making films, but also by writing about them. Canudo and Gance in France conceived of an artistic film medium before it existed. Münsterberg explored how the artistry of film begins with the psychology of perception and depends upon both art theory and the psychological functioning of attention, memory, imagination, modal thinking, and our capacities for empathy and sympathy. The art of film depends on both form and the use of form. Theorists interrogated how a machine that records could be used for abstract representation. Soviet montage filmmakers and theorists established a formidable body of theories elaborating how film functions as a dialectical machine that produces meaning through editing. Realists contested such highly formalist theories, arguing that film communicates not by abstracting images of reality, but by recording images and durations to experience. Film and photography function differently from the other arts. They provide audiences with the world itself through indexical traces, regardless how distorted the image may be. Whether formalist or realist, classical film theorists concentrate on the differences between seeing and hearing, on the one hand, and filmic representation on the other. Film is not a recording machine, nor an illusion machine, but a communication machine. This eventually led theorists to question whether film is a language.

 Classical film theory does not have the prominence it once had. Screen theory, or contemporary film theory, supplanted classical film theory with a different agenda. Motivated by the spirit of 1968, contemporary theory relied on poststructuralism, Marxism, and psychoanalysis to understand how film functions to support and reproduce capital, and to produce viewers as the subjects of capital. With these arguments came scepticism about the previously perceived stabilities of representation and meaning, and the theorisation of viewership became a dynamically political project. These arguments developed, though, not by defeating classical theory, but largely by ignoring it. Some of classical film theory’s arguments have been revisited by analytical film theory, but these reconsiderations have largely been inflected by analytical philosophy and cognitive theory.

 This project aims to identify and map the epistemologies of classical film theory, and to situate these ideas in 19th and 20th century thought. It develops a history that explores the interrelationships between theorising and making film. It also addresses a core limitation of the classical film theory canon. Classical film theory matured in film studies programmes in English speaking universities. Although many theories were translated into English, notably from German, French, and Russian, the discipline grew as an English-language phenomenon in North American and British universities. We encourage applications from those with foreign language skills and a willingness to explore international libraries and archives to bring to this discussion works absent from the English-language-centric debate. 

Academic Qualifications

A first degree (at least a 2.1) ideally in film, cultural, and/or media studies with a good fundamental knowledge of theories from one or more of those disciplines.

 English Language Requirement

IELTS score must be at least 6.5 (with not less than 6.0 in each of the four components). Other equivalent qualifications will be accepted. See the university webpage: https://www.napier.ac.uk/study-with-us/international-students/english-language/english-language-requirements

 Essential attributes

·       Fundamental experience of researching, reading, and writing in film, cultural, and/or media theory

·       Competent in detailed analyses of theory and relevant historiographic methods

·       Knowledge of a range of film and related theories from the late 19th century to the 1970s

·       Good written and oral communication skills

·       Strong motivation and ability to work autonomously, with independent research skills relevant to the project

·       Good time management

 Desirable attributes:

Foreign language competency.

 *****

Applications for part-time study welcome.

Deadlines & timescale: Our standard entry times for research degrees are October and March, but you can make your application at any time and it will be considered for the next available intake, in this case: apply by 30 November 2024 for potential entry on 1 March 2025, or by 31 May 2025 for 1 October 2025.

Creative Arts & Design (9) History & Archaeology (19)

References

Indicate Bibliography:
Abel, Richard, French Film Theory and Criticism: A History/Anthology, Vols 1 and 2 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).
Andrew, J. Dudley, The Major Film Theories: An Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976).
Arnheim, Rudolf, Film as Art [1932] (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1957).
Balázs, Béla, Theory of the Film: Character and Growth of a New Art (London: Dennis Dobson, 1952).
Bazin, André, What is Cinema?, Vols 1 [1967] and 2 [1971] (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005)
Carroll, Noël, Philosophical Problems of Classical Film Theory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).
Eisenstein, Sergei, Film Form: Essays in Film Theory, ed. and trans. Jay Leyda (New York, NY: Harcourt Brace, 1949).
Kracauer, Sigfried, Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality [1960] (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).
Metz, Christian, Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema, trans. by Michael Taylor (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991)
Michelson, Annette, ed., Kino-Eye: The Writings of Dziga Vertov, trans. Kevin O’Brien (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984).
Münsterberg, Hugo, The Photoplay: A Psychological Study (USA: D. Appleton and Company, 1916).
October special issue, ‘A Return to Classical Film Theory’
Rodowick, D.N., Elegy for Theory (Harvard University Press, 2015)
Turvey, Malcolm, ed. ‘A Return to Classical Film Theory?’ [special issue], October 148 (Spring 2014).

Register your interest for this project


Search Suggestions
Search suggestions

Based on your current searches we recommend the following search filters.