The evolution of mutualistic interactions and of aggregated dispersal


   School of Biological Sciences

This project is no longer listed on FindAPhD.com and may not be available.

Click here to search FindAPhD.com for PhD studentship opportunities
  Prof V Jansen  No more applications being accepted  Funded PhD Project (UK Students Only)

About the Project

Mutualistic interactions have long fascinated biologists. If a mutualism benefits the recipients of the mutualistic act but come at a cost to the provider, it is an evolutionary puzzle why interactions why such interactions exist. This puzzle has been solved for the simpler version where the positive interaction is between individuals of the same species. In that case the act is often called altruism or cooperation and its evolution can explained if the provision of the benefit is somehow intrinsically linked to the receipt of benefits from others. If this is at play within a species, the theories of reciprocity and inclusive fitness theory explain why altruistic acts evolve [1,2].

Mutualisms -positive interactions that occur between different species - have been described at various levels. They appear to be common among microbial communities but are also found higher organisms. Many plants appear to engage in mutualistic acts with microbes, that they take with them on their seeds. A further famous example is the interaction between mites, yeasts and dung beetles, in which the community of organisms appears to travel from one place to the next as a group [3].

In contrast to the single species counterpart, we do not have a well-developed understanding under what circumstances such interactions can evolve and be maintained. We know that it is crucial in the interaction that the mutualistic partners need to encounter each other with some regularity [e.g. 4-6] .

In this project we will employ models and adaptive dynamics to study when and how mutualisms will evolve. These models will take the form of a haystack model: a collections of demes that are seeded by groups of individuals [e.g 7]). After a time of interaction, the demes yield a new generation of dispersers that seed the next round of interaction. Of particular interest is the question if and how clumps of dispersers of different species can favour the evolution of a mutualism and whether, if a mutualism exists, whether clumping will evolve.

To apply follow link and instructions at https://www.royalholloway.ac.uk/studying-here/applying/postgraduate/how-to-apply/. Please indicate supervisor’s last name "Jansen" and project title in your application. Application deadline 12 March 2023


Biological Sciences (4) Mathematics (25)

Funding Notes

Fully funded PhD studentship for 3.5 years (UK student fee, research expenses and stipend aligned on UKRI conditions). Start Sept 2023

References

[1] Jansen, V.A.A., van Baalen, M. Altruism through beard chromodynamics (2006) Nature 440, 663–666 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04387
[2 ]Lion, S., V.A.A. Jansen, Day, T. Evolution in structured populations: beyond the kin versus group debate (2011) Trends in Ecology & Evolution,26, 193-201 10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.006
[3] Wilson, D.S., Knollenberg W.G. Adaptive indirect effects: the fitness of burying beetles with and without their phoretic mites (1987) Evolutionary Ecology 1(2):139-159 10.1007/BF02067397
[4] Yanni, S.J. , et al. (2020) Topological constraints in early multicellularity favor reproductive division of labor eLife 9:e54348 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54348
[5] Cooper, G.A.. Frost, H., Liu, M, West, S.A. (2021) The evolution of division of labour in structured and unstructured groups eLife 10:e71968 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71968
[6] Michod, R. E. Evolutionary transitions in individuality: multicellularity and sex (2013) In ,
in Brett Calcott, and Kim Sterelny (eds), The Major Transitions in Evolution Revisited
Cambridge, MA, MIT Press Scholarship Online https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015240.003.0010
[7] Lee, W., Van Baalen, M., & Jansen, V. A.A. (2016). Siderophore production and the evolution of investment in a public good: An adaptive dynamics approach to kin selection. Journal of theoretical biology, 388, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.09.038

How good is research at Royal Holloway, University of London in Biological Sciences?


Research output data provided by the Research Excellence Framework (REF)

Click here to see the results for all UK universities

Where will I study?