University of Birmingham Featured PhD Programmes
John Innes Centre Featured PhD Programmes
University of Kent Featured PhD Programmes
University of Kent Featured PhD Programmes
University of Southampton Featured PhD Programmes

The role of diversity training in an era of business and socio-economic uncertainty: Managing migrant workers’ social integration at the workplace in UK organisations

This project is no longer listed on FindAPhD.com and may not be available.

Click here to search FindAPhD.com for PhD studentship opportunities
  • Full or part time
    Dr F Mitsakis
    Dr P Mendonca
  • Application Deadline
    Applications accepted all year round

Project Description

This research study will examine the extent to which diversity training is implemented in UK businesses as an attempt to facilitate their migrant workers’ social integration at the workplace. The study will try to address the perceived challenges and benefits that diversity training could produce for individuals and the business in an era of economic and social uncertainty and insecurity. The large majority of brain outflows across European countries were recorded as brain inflows for UK. Precisely for the latter, brain inflows aimed at filling in the gap of severe labour market shortages, particularly in low skill and low paid sectors, such as manufacturing, hospitality and construction (McDowell, 2009). However, following the results of the UK referendum to leave EU, these developments have recently fostered political debate about the role and flows of migration within the UK. Considering all that, such a social phenomenon becomes increasingly a matter of concern within the EU, as in many cases, this brain mobility is not entirely exploited and for the benefit of both countries. In some other cases work migrants’ overflow from one country to another has also resulted to workplace-related problems such as lack of individuals’ social embeddedness in the workplace (David et al., 2012). Various immigration theories (e.g. Neoclassical, dual labour market, world systems, and network) will inform this research study. All suggest that brain mobility do not just occur owing to social and economic circumstances (and/or due to the push and pull factors), but because of many other factors which could also be at play (e.g. government policies etc.) and of similar importance (Kubursi, 2006; Jennissen, 2006; IOM, 2004; Bonifazi, 2001). Concurrently, it is widely suggested that diversity training could support the creation of a supporting climate of all employees’ social integration at the workplace so to contribute collectively to organisational goals (ibid). It further represents an important social network and structural aspect that can determine social support, cohesion and social capital (CIPD, 2017; Herring and Henderson, 2015; Song, 2012).

Methodology: A longitudinal survey would allow prospective applicants to examine the extent to which diversity training is offered in UK organisations as part of their efforts to facilitate their migrant workers’ social integration at the workplace. Following the relative lack of research focusing on the experiences and perception of social integration at the workplace on behalf of those who have been able to enter the labour market, this research study will shed light as to how diversity training could facilitate the social integration process through the respective perceptions of our research participants.

References

Bonifazi, C. (2001). International Migration Theory and the Migration process: Basic Reflections in the Italian Case. In Contributions to International Migration Studies. Edited by Bonifazi, C. and Gesano, G. Institute for Population Research: Roma.
CIPD (2017). Quarterly Labour Market Outlook, Retrieved on 20th April 2017 from: https://www.cipd.co.uk/Images/labour-market-outlook_2017-winter-2016-17_tcm18-18238.pdf London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
David, Al. Barwinska-Malajowicz, A. and Coenen, F. (2012). From brain drain to brain exchange: How to use better highly skilled workers. Jednolity Rynek Europejski (In English), 5(216): 25-35.
Herring, C. and Henderson, L. (2015). Diversity in Organisations. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
International Organization for Migration (2004). IOM’s Contribution towards the High-Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/population/meetings/thirdcoord2004/P14_IOM.pdf [assessed 25th April 2017].
Jennissen, R. (2006). Economic Theories of International Migration and the Role of Immigration Policy. Research and Documentation Center of the Dutch Ministry of Justice and the Netherlands Interdisciplinary Democratic Institute. Retrieved from http://epc2006.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=60112 [assessed 20th February 2017].
Kubursi, A. (2006). Economies of Migration and Remittances under Globalization. At: http://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/meetings/2006/hls2006/Preparatory/Statements/Kubursi_RT6.pdf [assessed 20th February 2017].
McDowell, L. (2009). Old and New European economic migrants: whiteness and managed migration policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(1): 19-36.
Song, L. (2012). Raising network resources while raising children? Access to social capital by parenthood status, gender, and marital status. Social Networks, 34(2): 241-252.

Related Subjects

How good is research at Nottingham Trent University in Business and Management Studies?

FTE Category A staff submitted: 23.00

Research output data provided by the Research Excellence Framework (REF)

Click here to see the results for all UK universities


FindAPhD. Copyright 2005-2019
All rights reserved.