Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now

  What are the genetic targets of sexual selection underlying rapid phenotypic divergence among species?


   Department of Biosciences

This project is no longer listed on FindAPhD.com and may not be available.

Click here to search FindAPhD.com for PhD studentship opportunities
  Prof Alistair McGregor, Prof Mike Ritchie, Dr M D Santos-Nunes  No more applications being accepted  Competition Funded PhD Project (Students Worldwide)

About the Project

Background

Sexual selection can drive the rapid divergence of male secondary sexual traits, including bird plumage and the external genital structures of insects (Eberhard 2010). Identifying the genes and mutations that cause these differences is key to understanding the role of sexual selection as a driver of phenotypic diversity among species. However, the genetic basis of these differences is poorly understood (Hagen et al., 2019). The external male genital structures of flies are derived from legs and play important roles in copulation (Casares et al., 1997). For example the posterior lobes of the male genital arch intercalate between the female tergites and are important for species-specific recognition and copulation (Frazee and Masly, 2015). The posterior lobes of males of species of the Drosophila simulans clade (D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana) have diverged dramatically in size and shape in less than 240,000 years, and are the only way to reliably distinguish these species morphologically (Garrigan et al., 2012; Kopp and True 2002). This difference is polygenic in basis but none of the causative genes have yet been identified (Zeng et al., 2000; Hagen et al., 2021). This project aims to identify and test genes underlying posterior lobe divergence through the following experimental objectives.

O1. Identify differentially expressed candidate genes underlying posterior lobe divergence between D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana.

O2. Explore sequence variation of candidates within and among species.

O3. Test the function of candidates during posterior lobe development.

O4. Characterise the effects of variation in candidate genes on mating behaviour and reproductive isolation.

Methodology

O1 will compare RNA-seq data among the developing genitalia and legs of D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana to identify genes that are differentially expressed in the genitalia but not legs that thus represent candidate genes contributing to differences in posterior lobe morphology among these three species.

O2 will use population genetics data to examine the levels of segregating and fixed sequence variants of candidate genes within and between the three species to help infer their contribution to posterior lobe divergence.

O3 will apply CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate reciprocal hemizygotes to test the function of candidate genes and verify their contribution to posterior lobe divergence.

O4 will use behavioural tests to compare the effect of candidate gene reciprocal hemizygotes on different aspects of copulation and fitness. These experiments will be carried out at Oxford Brookes University supervised by Dr Daniela Nunes.Background

Sexual selection can drive the rapid divergence of male secondary sexual traits, including bird plumage and the external genital structures of insects (Eberhard 2010). Identifying the genes and mutations that cause these differences is key to understanding the role of sexual selection as a driver of phenotypic diversity among species. However, the genetic basis of these differences is poorly understood (Hagen et al., 2019). The external male genital structures of flies are derived from legs and play important roles in copulation (Casares et al., 1997). For example the posterior lobes of the male genital arch intercalate between the female tergites and are important for species-specific recognition and copulation (Frazee and Masly, 2015). The posterior lobes of males of species of the Drosophila simulans clade (D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana) have diverged dramatically in size and shape in less than 240,000 years, and are the only way to reliably distinguish these species morphologically (Garrigan et al., 2012; Kopp and True 2002). This difference is polygenic in basis but none of the causative genes have yet been identified (Zeng et al., 2000; Hagen et al., 2021). This project aims to identify and test genes underlying posterior lobe divergence through the following experimental objectives.

O1. Identify differentially expressed candidate genes underlying posterior lobe divergence between D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana.

O2. Explore sequence variation of candidates within and among species.

O3. Test the function of candidates during posterior lobe development.

O4. Characterise the effects of variation in candidate genes on mating behaviour and reproductive isolation.

Methodology

O1 will compare RNA-seq data among the developing genitalia and legs of D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana to identify genes that are differentially expressed in the genitalia but not legs that thus represent candidate genes contributing to differences in posterior lobe morphology among these three species.

O2 will use population genetics data to examine the levels of segregating and fixed sequence variants of candidate genes within and between the three species to help infer their contribution to posterior lobe divergence.

O3 will apply CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate reciprocal hemizygotes to test the function of candidate genes and verify their contribution to posterior lobe divergence.

O4 will use behavioural tests to compare the effect of candidate gene reciprocal hemizygotes on different aspects of copulation and fitness. These experiments will be carried out at Oxford Brookes University supervised by Dr Daniela Nunes.

Biological Sciences (4)

Funding Notes

Informal enquiries should be directed to Professor Alistair McGregor ([Email Address Removed])

References

Casares et al. (1997). The genital disc of Drosophila melanogaster I. Segmental and compartmental organisation. Dev. Genes Evol. 207: 216
Eberhard (2010). Evolution of genitalia: Theories, evidence, and new directions. Genetica 138: 5.
Frazee and Masly (2015). Multiple sexual selection pressures drive the rapid evolution of complex morphology in a male secondary genital structure. Ecology and Evolution 5:4437.
Garrigan et al. (2012). Genome sequencing reveals complex speciation in the Drosophila simulans clade. Genome Res. 22: 1499.
Hagen et al. (2019). tartan underlies the evolution of Drosophila male genital morphology. PNAS USA 116:19025.
Hagen et al. (2021). Unravelling the genetic basis for the rapid diversification of male genitalia between Drosophila species. Molecular Biology and Evolution, msaa232, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa232.
Kopp and True (2002). Evolution of male sexual characters in the oriental Drosophila melanogaster species group. Evolution and Development 4: 278.
Zeng et al. (2000). Genetic architecture of a morphological shape difference between two Drosophila species. Genetics 154: 299.
Search Suggestions
Search suggestions

Based on your current searches we recommend the following search filters.