• Brunel University London Featured PhD Programmes
  • University of Warwick Featured PhD Programmes
  • University of Leicester Featured PhD Programmes
  • Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine Featured PhD Programmes
  • University of Glasgow Featured PhD Programmes
  • University of Glasgow Featured PhD Programmes
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (Heidelberg) Featured PhD Programmes
University of Glasgow Featured PhD Programmes
University of Leeds Featured PhD Programmes
Imperial College London Featured PhD Programmes
University of Reading Featured PhD Programmes

Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes mellitus: randomized and real-word evidence


Project Description

Objectives of the research
This PhD project will aim to examine the clinical effectiveness of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is combining RCTs and “real-word” evidence. Specific objectives are:
1. To conduct a network meta-analysis to assess the comparative effectiveness of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is using information from RCTs
2. Conduct a longitudinal study using routinely collected primary care data to assess the effectiveness of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs in type 2 diabetes in the real world
3. Synthesise the evidence from RCTs and real world studies together
4. Assess the comparative cost-effectiveness of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs

Brief outline plan of research over the 3-7 years:
The project will involve the use of published aggregate-level data and available large existing datasets such as the Clinical Practice Research Datalink,

Assuming an intake of a full-time PhD student the following table describes a tentative research plan for the course of the PhD.

Time Task Objective
Months 1-10 Network Meta-analysis Evidence of the effectiveness of drugs from the trial
Months 10-20 Longitudinal studies Real World Evidence of the effectiveness of the drugs
Months 20-24 Evidence synthesis Combining RCT and observational evidence
Months 24- 32 Health economic analysis (one of the selected two data sources) Health care utilisation and health care costs, benefits of healthy lifestyle
Months 33 onwards Thesis writing

Methodology to be used:
1. Systematic literature review
2. Synthesis of available RCTs evidence with a network meta-analytical approach
3. Data management and manipulation of large primary care datasets
4. Combination of randomised and observational evidence
5. Health economic analysis

Background to Project
A range of glucose-lowering medications are currently available for the treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. In the last few years, two new classes of glucose-lowering drugs have been introduced and widely used [1]: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). The efficacy and safety of different formulations of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2i have been extensively compared to other glucose-lowering therapies in several randomised clinical trials (RCTs) [2-3]. Very limited, on the other hand, is the evidence from direct comparisons between GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2i.

Current ADA/EASD guidelines suggest either GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2i as add-on to metformin (alone or in combination with other treatments) if glucose control is not achieved; however, no specific suggestions are given about which agent should be preferred [4]. In this view, it would be relevant to know which medication performs better and is associated with a lower risk of side effects to help decision makers in an informed choice.

When direct ‘head-to-head’ data are unavailable or limited, network meta-analysis (NMA) is considered the methodology of choice to estimate the comparative effectiveness of multiple treatments [5]. Recently, softwares to perform NMA have been made available in widely-used statistical softwares (i.e., Stata and R), widening their applications. Data from published RCTs can therefore be synthesised using NMA to evaluate differences across treatments and rank them according to a specific outcome.

For a better and wider understanding of treatment efficacy, however, data from RCTs should be considered along with “real-word” evidence (RWE). RWE supplements the knowledge obtained from RCTs, whose limitations are the generalisability to larger, more inclusive populations of patients [6]. Large primary care databases (i.e., Clinical Practice Research Datalink) have been used to evaluate the effects of treatments in “real-word” patients although the evidence about glucose-lowering effects of GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2i is very limited. Furthermore, recent methodological advancements make possible to “combine” evidence from RCT and RWE accounting for their differences [7].

A more precise estimate of GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2i effects obtained from RCTs and RWE data can also allow performing a health economics analysis to compare these new classes of treatments with other available glucose-lowering drugs.

Funding Notes

The studentship is funded by East Midlands CLAHRC which is a collaboration of University of Leicester and associated partners. The award will pay full-time University UK/EU tuition fees for three years and include a tax-free annual maintenance grant worth at least £14,553 a year.

References

1. (Publication date: August 3, 2016) Prescribing for Diabetes, England - 2005/06 to 2015/16. http://content.digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB21158/pres-diab-eng-200506-201516.pdf
2. Drucker DJ et al. Incretin-based therapies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: evaluation of the risks and benefits. Diabetes Care. 2010;33: 428-433
3. Ferrannini E et al. SGLT2 inhibition in diabetes mellitus: rationale and clinical prospects. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2012;8: 495-502
4. Inzucchi SE et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centred approach. Update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015;58: 429-442
5. Sutton A, et al. Use of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons for technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics 2008;26: 753-767
6. Sherman RE et al. Real-World Evidence - What Is It and What Can It Tell Us? N Engl J Med 2016;375: 2293-2297
7. Efthimiou O et al. Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2017 Jan 12

How good is research at University of Leicester in Public Health, Health Services and Primary Care?

FTE Category A staff submitted: 24.20

Research output data provided by the Research Excellence Framework (REF)

Click here to see the results for all UK universities

Email Now

Insert previous message below for editing? 
You haven’t included a message. Providing a specific message means universities will take your enquiry more seriously and helps them provide the information you need.
Why not add a message here
* required field
Send a copy to me for my own records.

Your enquiry has been emailed successfully



Share this page:

Cookie Policy    X