Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now

  Developing Economic Modelling to Support a Broader Search for Efficiency: A Case Study in Infertility Treatment


   School of Medicine, Medical Sciences & Nutrition

This project is no longer listed on FindAPhD.com and may not be available.

Click here to search FindAPhD.com for PhD studentship opportunities
  Dr G Scotland, Dr D McLernon  No more applications being accepted  Competition Funded PhD Project (European/UK Students Only)

About the Project

In the context of health service resource constraints, investment in new health care treatments requires corresponding disinvestment in existing treatments and services in order to free up the required resources. Ideally, those responsible for the management of treatment services should aim to disinvest in the low value treatments and reinvest in higher value alternatives. This ensures that system level benefits can improve in the face of resource scarcity. However, research suggests that the actual process of disinvestment is less explicit, with treatments and services implicitly displaced without consideration of their comparative value relative to those they are displaced by (Karlsberg Schaffer et al, 2013).

Factors that contribute to this sub-optimal approach include a lack of evidence on the value of all in-use treatments, and shortcomings in the current approach to economic evaluation for informing efficient reallocations of resources (Scotland and Bryan, 2016). One way of using economic evaluation to better support the challenge of balancing investment and disinvestment in health care technology, is to adopt a broader frame to explicitly identify efficient reallocations of resources within disease pathways (Tappenden et al 2012). This entails developing decision models with the capability of evaluating changes at more than one point in a care pathway; for example, different sequences of first, second and third line treatment options. With such models it becomes possible to explicitly identify changes in the mix and sequence of treatment options that can deliver greater system level benefit without increasing (and perhaps even decreasing) the overall resources required for the treatment pathway as a whole.

Using the treatment pathways for infertility as a case study, this PhD programme will support the development of such an economic model. Some couples have absolute barriers to conception and require immediate treatment, but many more, in whom no medical cause for their infertility can be found (unexplained infertility), have reasonable chances of having a baby without treatment. Due to the invasiveness and cost of assisted reproduction (Pandy et al, 2014), clinicians find it difficult to decide when to abandon a wait and see (expectant management) approach and initiate treatment. There is also debate about the sequence in which alternative types of fertility treatment should be offered to couples with different characteristics (Bahadur et al, 2016). The PhD programme will make use of large observational datasets (local and national) to inform probabilities of treatment success (based on individual patient characteristics) with different types of treatment in comparison to expectant management. It will build on existing statistical models that have been developed to predict the chances of having a baby in couples with unexplained infertility at different time-points with and without initialisation of treatment (McLernon et al, 2014; McLernon et al, 2016). These statistical models will be further extended and incorporated in an economic decision model to simulate the impact of marginal changes in the timing and sequence of treatments within the care pathway. The objective is to develop an economic model that can be used to improve the efficiency of the fertility treatment pathway as a whole.

You will join a multidisciplinary collaborative team with an international reputation in the area of fertility research, and expertise in health economic modelling and the creation of innovative prediction models. This project will suit a numerically skilled student who is interested in reproductive health research, and who preferably holds a postgraduate qualification in health economics, medical statistics or a related quantitative discipline.

Prospective students should include a written statement of no more than 1,000 words that outlines their initial ideas about how they would like to focus and conduct this project. Please upload this document with your formal application.

Funding Notes

This project is part of a competition funded by the Roy Weir PhD Studentship. Full funding is available to UK/EU applicants only.

Candidates should have (or expect to achieve) a minimum of a 2.1 Honours degree in a relevant subject. Applicants with a minimum of a 2.2 Honours degree may be considered provided they have a Distinction at Masters level.

Please apply for admission to the 'Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Health Economics' to ensure that your application is passed to the correct school for processing.

References

1. Karlsberg Schaffer, S., Sussex, J., Devlin, N. and Walker, A. (2013) Searching for Cost-effectiveness Thresholds in NHS Scotland. Office of Health Economics, London, 2013. https://www.ohe.org/publications/searching-cost-effectiveness-thresholds-nhs-scotland.

2. Scotland G, Bryan S. Why do health economists promote technology adoption rather than the search for efficiency? A proposal for a change in our approach to economic evaluation in health care. Medical Decision Making; Epub ahead of print.

3. Tappenden P, Chilcott J, Brennan A, Squires H, Stevenson M. Whole disease modeling to inform resource allocation decisions in cancer: a methodological framework. Value Health. 2012;15(8): 1127–36.

4. Bahadur G, Homburg R, Muneer A, et al. First line fertility treatment strategies regarding IUI and IVF require clinical evidence. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 1141-1146.

5. Pandey S, McLernon DJ, Scotland G, Mollison J, Wordsworth S, Bhattacharya S. Cost of fertility treatment and live birth outcome in women of different ages and BMI. Hum Reprod 2014; 29(10): 2199-2211. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu184).

6. McLernon DJ, te Velde ER, Steyerberg EW, Mol BWJ, Bhattacharya S. Clinical prediction models to inform individualized decision-making in subfertile couples: a stratified medicine approach. Hum Reprod 2014; 29(9): 1851-1858. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu173.

7. McLernon DJ, Lee AJ, Bhattacharya S. Predicting the chances of a live birth pregnancy at different points in time in couples with unexplained fertility. Fertil Steril 2016;106(3) (Supp):e332.

Where will I study?