Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now

  Women on boards: a qualitative inquiry of the antecedents and barriers to board gender diversity in developing countries (Advert Ref: RDF18/AFM/SOROUR)


   Faculty of Business and Law

This project is no longer listed on FindAPhD.com and may not be available.

Click here to search FindAPhD.com for PhD studentship opportunities
  Prof Karim Sorour  No more applications being accepted  Competition Funded PhD Project (Students Worldwide)

About the Project

The board of directors is a fundamental element of effective corporate governance practices, with the extant literature showing that board diversity can enhance the effectiveness of such practices (Terjesen et. al., 2009). For example, Nielsen and Huse (2010) argue that boards with higher ratios of women directors have more effective strategic control, higher board development activities and decreased level of conflict. However, the extant literature also documents issues and challenges do exist on both supply and demand sides inhibiting the realisation of diversity, especially regarding women board participation. Gabaldon et. al. (2016) demonstrate in their award winning article that the supply side barriers can include gender differences in values and attitudes, identification with gender role expectations, work-family conflict, while, the demand side barriers can include issues such as gender discrimination, biased perceptions of what women may bring to the board and institutional environment barriers. The latter would include cultural as well as legal issues (Grosvold and Brammer, 2011).
Although there are instruments and policies devised to address this issue especially in developed countries, the transferability and effectiveness of such policies in developed countries context can be questioned on the grounds of peculiarity of such context. Also, the view that corporate governance is a socially constructed phenomenon makes a one size fits all solution less plausible in developing countries contexts, where the institutional environment within the national business environment and beyond i.e. national culture, can have unique implications on corporate governance and board diversity practices and challenges. Hence, addressing these issues should be based on careful consideration of the context in which corporate governance is embedded (Sorour and Howell, 2013; Letza et al., 2008). Here, a recent survey shows that women participation in boards is quite low in developing/emerging countries with percentages of board’s seats held by women being as low as 3.7% in Indonesia, 7.7% in India and 6.3% in Brazil (Deloitte, 2014) let alone countries with no reliable data about this matter. Thus, this project heeds the call to explore the antecedents and barriers to an effective participation of women on boards in developing and emerging countries (Gabaldon et al., 2016).
Using an appropriate theoretical underpinning, the research will explore the antecedents and barriers to women participation on boards in developing/emerging countries context using both primary and secondary data and following an interpretive approach relevant to the project. Applications should discuss through a research proposal how this theme would be researched, and highlight how access to research participants is expected to be managed.

Eligibility and How to Apply
Please note eligibility requirement:
• Academic excellence of the proposed student i.e. 2:1 (or equivalent GPA from non-UK universities [preference for 1st class honours]); or a Masters (preference for Merit or above); or APEL evidence of substantial practitioner achievement.
• Appropriate IELTS score, if required.
• Applicants cannot apply for this funding if currently engaged in Doctoral study at Northumbria or elsewhere.

For further details of how to apply, entry requirements and the application form, see
https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/research/postgraduate-research-degrees/how-to-apply/

Please note: Applications that do not include a research proposal of approximately 1,000 words (not a copy of the advert), or that do not include the advert reference (e.g. RDF18/…) will not be considered.

Deadline for applications: 28 January 2018
Start Date: 1 October 2018

Northumbria University takes pride in, and values, the quality and diversity of our staff. We welcome applications from all members of the community. The University holds an Athena SWAN Bronze award in recognition of our commitment to improving employment practices for the advancement of gender equality and is a member of the Euraxess network, which delivers information and support to professional researchers

Funding Notes

The studentship includes a full stipend, paid for three years at RCUK rates (for 2017/18, this is £14,553 pa) and fees.

References

• Deloitte (2014). Women in the boardroom: A global perspective. Fourth edition.
• Gabaldon, P., de Anca, C., Mateos de Cabo, R., and Gimeno, R. (2016) Searching for Women on Boards: An Analysis from the Supply and Demand Perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24: 371–385. doi: 10.1111/corg.12141.
• Grosvold, J. & Brammer, S. 2011. National institutional systems as antecedents of female board representation: An empirical study, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19: 116–135.
• Letza, S., Kirkbride, J., Sun, X., & Smallman, C. (2008). Corporate Governance Theorising: Limits, Critics and Alternatives International Journal of Law and Management, 50(1), 17-32.
• Nielsen, S. and Huse, M. (2010), The Contribution of Women on Boards of Directors: Going beyond the Surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18: 136–148. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00784.x
• Sorour, K. M., Howell, K. (2013). A Grounded Theory Analysis of Corporate Governance in Egyptian Banking. Qualitative Research Journal, V13, Issue (3) DOI:10.1108/QRJ-03-2013-0017
• Terjesen, S., Sealy, R. and Singh, V. (2009), Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research Agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 320–337. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x

Recent publications by supervisors relevant to this project:

1. Nakpodia, F., Shrives, P. & Sorour, M.K. (2017). Examining the link between religion and corporate governance: Insights from Nigeria. Business & Society (forthcoming)
2. Abdou, H., Agbeyo, O., Jones, K. & Sorour, M.K. (2016). The Impact of M&A on the Nigerian Financial Market: A Pre-Post Analysis, Investment Management and Financial Innovation, 13 (1), pp.138-150. ( With Abdou, H., Agbeyo, O., Jones)
3. Howell, K., Sorour, M.K. (2016) Corporate Governance in Africa: Assessing Implementation and Ethical Perspectives. Palgrave MacMillan.
4. Sorour, M,K. Sakhaway, A., (2016). On The Evolution of Corporate Governance Culture in Africa: The Case of the Egyptian Banking Sector. In Howell &Sorour (Eds.), Corporate Governance In Africa: Assessing implementation and Ethical Perspectives, Palgrave Macmillan
5. Sorour, M.K. (2014). Corporate Governance Reform in Egypt: Achievements and Challenges Ahead. In K. Çalıyurt & Idowu (Eds.), Corporate Governance: An International Perspective: Springer ISBN 978-3-642-45167-6
6. Sorour, K. M., Howell, K. (2013). A Grounded Theory Analysis of Corporate Governance in Egyptian Banking. Qualitative Research Journal, V13, Issue (3) DOI:10.1108/QRJ-03-2013-0017
7. Sorour, K. M., Howell, K. (2012). Corporate Governance, Substantive Theory and Sociological Institutionalism: The Case of the Egyptian Banking Sector, Journal of Corporate Ownership and Control, V10, Issue 1 (7)
8. Sorour, K. M., Howell, K. & Mishra, A. (2012). On Bank Governance in Developing Countries: Assessment of Egypt, Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics and Business Law, V.3 (1)
9. Corlett, S. & Mavin, S. (2014) Intersectionality and identity: shared tenets and future research agendas for gender and identity studies, Gender in Management: An International Journal, Special Issue editorial commentary, 29(5), 258-276
10. Shrives,P. & Brennan,N. (2017). Explanations for Corporate Governance non-compliance: A rhetorical analysis Critical Perspectives on Accounting (forthcoming)
11. Shrives,P. & Brennan,N. (2015). A typology for exploring the quality of explanations for non-compliance with UK Corporate Governance regulations, The British Accounting Review, V47 (1)

Where will I study?