Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now Don't miss our weekly PhD newsletter | Sign up now

  Artificial intelligence methods in health technology assessment (HTA): efficient decision-making for allocation of pharmacological treatment strategies in subpopulations of cancer patients


   Department of Population Health Sciences

This project is no longer listed on FindAPhD.com and may not be available.

Click here to search FindAPhD.com for PhD studentship opportunities
  Dr S Bujkiewicz, Dr M Sweeting  No more applications being accepted  Funded PhD Project (European/UK Students Only)

About the Project

Recent advances have led to the discovery of a multitude of pharmacological therapies in cancer. Many of them are targeted to small subsets of the population, for example those patients who are positive for a particular genetic biomarker. When clinical trials of targeted therapies are based on small samples of patients, their long-term effectiveness, measured for example by overall survival (OS), may be obtained with large uncertainty, in particular when the effect of a new treatment under investigation is measured relatively early before sufficiently mature data are collected.

To deliver new therapies to patients early, regulatory agencies (such as the European Medicines Agency in the EU or Food and Drug Administration in the US) have introduced flexible licensing pathways, by allowing conditional licensing based on treatment effects measured on a short-term surrogate endpoint (for example progression free survival (PFS)). Surrogate endpoints can be used to measure the effect of a new treatment earlier and with higher precision compared to a final clinical outcome, such as OS. Nevertheless, use of surrogate endpoints may bring another level of uncertainty if the surrogate relationship between the treatment effects on the surrogate and final outcomes is not properly evaluated, as decisions will rely on predictions based on such surrogate relationships.

This project will bring together a range of artificial intelligence methods to inform a complex decision-making process at the licencing and reimbursement stages by the regulatory bodies and health technology assessment (HTA) agencies (such as NICE in England and Wales). A complex decision-modelling framework informed by effectiveness parameters obtained using advanced evidence synthesis techniques will be developed to combine information from diverse sources of evidence that are needed to make robust decisions under uncertainty.

The PhD project will explore many aspects of Bayesian modelling that include quantifying uncertainty, probabilistic reasoning, decision networks and value of information in HTA decision-making, in the framework of artificial intelligence (AI) methodology. Supervised machine learning technics will support the decision modelling framework by using a range of sources of data to learn about the relationships between key parameters in the decision model. A case study in advanced colorectal cancer, a complex disease with a range of genetic variants, will be used to develop the decision-making framework.

Applications are invited from candidates with MSc in Medical Statistics, Biostatistics, Statistics, Health Economics or related discipline.


Funding Notes

MRC IMPACT DTP studentship which offers a stipend and fee waiver for 3 years.

EU nationals, EEA and Swiss nationals (EEA migrant workers) should refer to the full RCUK guidelines to check eligibility (you may be eligible for a fees only award). https://mrc.ukri.org/skills-careers/studentships/studentship-guidance/student-eligibility-requirements/

References

1. S. Russell, P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: a modern approach, Pearson Education Limited 2016 (third edition).
2. Bujkiewicz S, Thompson JR, Spata E, Abrams KR, Uncertainty in the Bayesian meta-analysis of normally distributed surrogate endpoints, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2017; 26 (5): 2287–2318.
3. Ciani O, Buyse M, Drummond M, Rasi G, Saad ED, Taylor RS, Time to Review the Role of Surrogate End Points in Health Policy: State of the Art and the Way Forward, Value in Health 2017;20:487-495.
4. Achana FA, Cooper NJ, Bujkiewicz S, Hubbard SJ, Kendrick D, Jones DR and Sutton AJ, Network meta-analysis of multiple outcome measures accounting for borrowing of information across outcomes, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2014, 14:92.
5. Welton N, Sutton A, Cooper N, Abrams K, Ades A. Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making in Healthcare. Chichester: Wiley and Sons; 2012.