• University of Manchester Featured PhD Programmes
  • University of Birmingham Featured PhD Programmes
  • Heriot-Watt University Featured PhD Programmes
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Featured PhD Programmes
  • University of Southampton Featured PhD Programmes
  • University College London Featured PhD Programmes
  • FindA University Ltd Featured PhD Programmes
University of Strathclyde Featured PhD Programmes
Cranfield University Featured PhD Programmes
Coventry University Featured PhD Programmes
University of the West of England, Bristol Featured PhD Programmes
FindA University Ltd Featured PhD Programmes

Measuring the Quality and Cultural Biases of user-generated web content

This project is no longer listed in the FindAPhD
database and may not be available.

Click here to search the FindAPhD database
for PhD studentship opportunities
  • Full or part time
    Dr P Dondio
  • Application Deadline
    Applications accepted all year round
  • Awaiting Funding Decision/Possible External Funding
    Awaiting Funding Decision/Possible External Funding

Project Description

Science Without Borders Project

It is now more than 10 years since a famous study was published by Nature, comparing the quality of free Wikipedia against Encyclopaedia Britannica, arguably the most scholarly of the expert-based encyclopaedias. The study found how Wikipedia scientific articles had only a small, not significant number of errors more than Britannica articles.
However, no major studies followed that one, despite user-generated content represents nowadays a significant part of all the web content, and despite the success of many other notable examples of user-generated content, such as StackOverflow, StockWiki, OpenMap, TripAdvisor and so forth.
The soundness of user-generated content is still under scrutiny, and indeed it is not only a question of soundness. It is also relevant how information is presented. Content – even when accurate – could suffer from cultural or linguistic prejudices, omissions, subjectivity, bias and lack of neutral point of view.
The aim of this project is to systematically analyse how common topics are presented by user-generated sources against analogous expert-based sources.
In addition to online Encyclopaedias, the project could be extended to other user-generated online repositories to be compared against their expert-based counterparts. For instance, in the field of Computing the project could compare the quality of the Stack Overflow forum with University textbooks or expert websites covering the same topics.
The project will employ both quantitative and qualitative research methods. The candidate will design novel indicators of information quality, tools for objectivity analysis and various tests to discover information bias, not only by considering the text produced but also the network of users creating such a text.
Regarding the computational technique that could be used, the main candidates are represented by Text and Data Mining, Machine Learning and Social Network Analysis. The tools developed could have interesting commercial potential in fields such as reputation systems, automatic content quality and computational trust.

Funding Notes

Science Without Borders

Share this page:

Cookie Policy    X